Contact: Helena Ruffin
                  310-399-1200
                  helena@rosegreene.com

Rose Greene, CFP© ATTENDS LPL FINANCIAL 2010 NATIONAL CONFERENCE, A LEADING FINANCIAL SERVICES EVENT FOCUSED ON INCREASING VALUE TO INVESTORS

Santa Monica, CA – August 17, 2010—Rose Greene of Rose Greene Financial Services in Santa Monica recently attended focus10, a leading financial services industry conference hosted by LPL Financial, an independent broker-dealer.  Rose Greene Financial Services is associated with LPL Financial.

Held in Boston from July 28 to July 31, 2010, focus10 was one of the industry’s largest gatherings of independent financial advisors, and remains the industry’s premier sales and education event. Approximately 4,500 attendees from around the country assembled for the opportunity to learn new strategies and skills, expand knowledge in numerous product areas and network with peers and industry experts. They also heard from influential speakers who addressed current events and financial industry trends. The speakers included Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States; Jack Welch, former chairman and CEO of General Electric; and Benjamin Zander, conductor of the Boston Philharmonic.

Additionally, through the hundreds of business sessions, technology training sessions and continuing education classes at this event, LPL Financial advisors gained valuable knowledge to help them continually improve the service they offer to clients and operate their independent practices more efficiently.

Bill Dwyer, president of National Sales and Marketing for LPL Financial, said, “The theme of our focus10 event, A Focus on the American Dream, clearly resonated with the current mood of Main Street U.S. investors.  Supporting our independent advisors as they help their clients achieve the American Dream on their terms remains our overarching mission at LPL Financial.”

About  Rose Greene Financial Services
Rose Greene Financial Services, founded in 1986,  is an independent and unique, entrepreneurial financial advisory practice. As an independent representative of LPL Financial, Rose Greene Financial Services provides unbiased investment advice and services including wealth management; retirement planning; college planning; life, health and long-term care insurance services; Medicare planning; estate planning and charitable giving. Her client base is highly diverse with a concentration in the baby boomer market, gay and lesbian community and entertainment industry. With more than 27 years in the industry, Rose Greene Financial Services has extensive experience serving clients through difficult market environments including the past six bear markets, as well as experience in helping near-term and current retirees plan for retirement income distributions. Her investment philosophy is rooted as much in strategies for managing downside risk as it is in building upside growth potential. Rose Greene Financial Services is located in the Santa Monica area of Los Angeles. For more information, visit www.rosegreene.com.

About LPL Financial
LPL Financial is an independent broker-dealer with over 2,500 employees and offices in Boston, Charlotte, and San Diego.  LPL Financial and its affiliates offer proprietary technology, comprehensive clearing and compliance services, practice management programs and training, and independent research to over 12,000 independent financial advisors and financial advisors at financial institutions.  Additionally, the company supports over 4,000 financial advisors who are affiliated and licensed with insurance companies with customized clearing, advisory platforms and technology solutions.  For more information, please visit www.lpl.com.

Securities and financial planning offered through LPL Financial, member FINRA/SIPC.

Planning for retirement is a lifelong process defined by distinct phases: the Accumulation Phase, represented by your working years; and the Distribution Phase, which you enter when you retire or begin tapping into your retirement savings. By implementing some basic planning steps during each of these phases, you can achieve your financial goals for retirement without undue stress. Following are some simple guidelines for your consideration.

The Accumulation Phase
During your working years, it is important to “set the stage” for a financially secure retirement by determining your retirement income needs. This task involves identifying your potential retirement expenses, as well as estimating the amount you might receive from each potential source of retirement income – e.g., Social Security, pensions, personal investments and employment earnings.

Doing this calculation will give you an idea of how much you may need to accumulate to finance a comfortable retirement. Don’t be surprised if the numbers add up to be a large sum – after all, this money may need to support you for 20 or 30 years. Fortunately, there are ways to leverage your dollars.

Starting to save early and contributing as much as possible to employer-sponsored retirement plans and IRAs may help you to potentially accumulate more money. Why? Because investing in these tax-advantaged accounts means your money will work harder for you. The longer the money sits untouched, the more it can potentially compound.

Another important step to take during the accumulation phase is to craft an appropriate asset allocation. The term asset allocation refers to the way you divide your investment nest egg among stocks, bonds and cash. The combination of assets you choose should reflect your financial goals, tolerance for investment risk and time horizon. Be aware that your asset allocation will need to be adjusted periodically in response to major market moves or life changes.

The Distribution Phase
Once you are nearing retirement, it will also be necessary to craft a solid strategy for the distribution of your assets. For example, did you know that one of the greatest risks retirees face is the possibility of outliving their money? That is why it is essential to determine an appropriate annual withdrawal rate. This amount will be based on your overall assets, the estimated length of your retirement, an assumed annual rate of inflation and how much your investments might earn each year.

Another consideration: After age 70½, you will have to begin making an annual withdrawal from some tax-deferred retirement accounts, including traditional IRAs.1 This is known as a required minimum distribution, or RMD. Preparing for this phase ahead of time may help reduce your tax burden, especially if your annual RMD may push you into a higher tax bracket.

Likewise, this is the time to make sure your final wishes are accurately documented and estate strategies are well underway to minimize the tax burden of your heirs.

Your Planning Checklist
Following is a list that can help you along the way. Find the category that best describes you. After answering the questions, bring the list to your financial advisor who can help make sure your retirement plan is on target.

Saving for Retirement

• Have you performed a comprehensive retirement needs calculation?
• Are you contributing enough to potentially reach your financial goal within your desired time frame by maximizing contributions to tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as your employer-sponsored retirement plan and an IRA?
• Is your asset allocation aligned with your retirement goal, risk tolerance and time horizon?
•  Have you determined if you might benefit from contributing to a traditional IRA or a Roth IRA?₂
• Do you review your retirement portfolio each year and rebalance your asset allocation if necessary?

Nearing Retirement

• Do you know the payout options available to you (e.g., annuity or lump sum) with your employer-sponsored retirement account, and have you reviewed the pros and cons of each option?
• Have you considered your health insurance options, (i.e., Medicare and various Medigap supplemental plans or employer-sponsored health insurance), out-of-pocket medical expenses and other related health care costs?
• Have you contacted Social Security to make sure your benefit statement and  relevant personal information are accurate?
• Should you purchase long-term care insurance? If so, have you investigated which benefits are desirable?
• Is your asset allocation properly adjusted to reflect your need to begin drawing income from your portfolio soon?
• Have you determined an appropriate withdrawal rate for your assets to help ensure that your retirement money might last 20, 30 or more years?
• Have you figured the amount of your annual required minimum distribution (RMD) and developed a strategy to reduce your tax burden once you’re required to begin taking RMDs?
• Have you appointed a health care proxy and durable power of attorney to take charge of your health and financial affairs if you are unable to do so?
• Have you reviewed all your financial and legal documents to make sure beneficiaries are up-to-date?
• Are you making effective use of estate planning tools (such as trusts or a gifting strategy) that could reduce your taxable estate and pass along more assets to your heirs while also benefiting you now?

To download a pdf of this article click HERE

1Withdrawals will be subject to taxation upon withdrawal at then-current rates. In addition, early withdrawals before age 59½ may be subject to a penalty tax.

2Restrictions, penalties and taxes may apply. Unless certain criteria are met, Roth IRA owners must be 59½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals are permitted.

This article was prepared by Standard & Poor’s Financial Communications and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. Consult your financial advisor or me if you have any questions.

Create a pool of healthcare dollars that will grow in any market.
Provided by Los Angeles Financial Planner, Rose Greene, CFP®

Your premium payments buy you access to a large pool of money which can be used to pay for long term care costs. By paying for LTC out of that pool of money, you can preserve your retirement savings and income.

The cost of assisted living or nursing home care alone could motivate you to pay the premiums. Genworth Financial conducts a respected annual Cost of Care Survey to gauge the price of long term care in the U.S. The 2010 report found that

Why procrastinate? The earlier you opt for LTC coverage, the cheaper the premiums. This is why many people purchase it before they retire. Those in poor health or over the age of 80 are frequently ineligible for coverage.

What it pays for. Some people think LTC coverage just pays for nursing home care. That’s inaccurate. It can pay for a wide variety of nursing, social, and rehabilitative services at home and away from home, for people with a chronic illness or disability or people who just need assistance bathing, eating or dressing.₃

Choosing a DBA. That stands for Daily Benefit Amount – the maximum amount that your LTC plan will pay per day for care in a nursing home facility. You can choose a Daily Benefit Amount when you pay for your LTC coverage, and you can also choose the length of time that you may receive the full DBA on a daily basis. The DBA typically ranges from a few dozen dollars to hundreds of dollars. Some of these plans offer you “inflation protection” at enrollment, meaning that every few years, you will have the chance to buy additional coverage and get compounding – so your pool of money can grow.

The Medicare misconception. Too many people think Medicare will pick up the cost of long term care. Medicare is not long term care insurance. Medicare will only pay for the first 100 days of nursing home care, and only if 1) you are getting skilled care and 2) you go into the nursing home right after a hospital stay of at least 3 days. Medicare also covers limited home visits for skilled care, and some hospice services for the terminally ill. That’s all.₂

Now, Medicaid can actually pay for long term care – if you are destitute. Are you willing to wait until you are broke for a way to fund long term care? Of course not. LTC insurance provides a way to do it.

Why not look into this? You may have heard that LTC insurance is expensive compared with some other forms of policies. But the annual premiums (about as much as you’d spend on a used car from the late 1990s) are nothing compared to real-world LTC costs.4 Ask your insurance advisor or financial advisor about some of the LTC choices you can explore – while many Americans have life, health and disability insurance, that’s not the same thing as long term care coverage.

If you would like a complimentary quote, please call our Director of Insurance, Helena Ruffin, who would be delighted to help you develop a plan for your long-term care insurance needs.

Rose Greene is a Representative with Rose Greene Financial and may be reached at www.rosegreene.com, 310-399-1200 or rose@rosegreene.com.

Citations.
1 genworth.com/content/etc/medialib/genworth_v2/pdf/ltc_cost_of_care.Par.85518.File.dat/Executive%20Summary_gnw.pdf  [4/10]
2 – aarp.org/families/caregiving/caring_help/what_does_long_term_care_cost.html [11/11/08]
3 – pbs.org/nbr/site/features/special/article/long-term-care-insurance_SP/ [11/11/08]
4 – longtermcare.gov/LTC/Main_Site/Paying_LTC/Private_Programs/LTC_Insurance/index.aspx [6/25/09]

The economic challenges that Europe has been facing recently has made investors nervousness about the health of the global economy, has created an opportunity for homeowners here in the US.  Investors have been fleeing riskier securities and moving to the perceived safety of U.S. Treasury securities.  This has created a significant demand for US Treasury securities which  has bid up the price of these securities and in turn driven down interest rates to historical lows.

The average rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage nationwide dropped to 4.92 percent at the end of May, from 4.96 percent the previous week, the lowest level since Bankrate.com began keeping track 25 years ago.

Rates have been hovering in the 5 percent to 5.5 percent range for some time. They last touched above 6 percent in November 2008, just as the U.S. financial crisis was unfolding.

Refinancing out of risky adjustable loans or lowering existing fixed rate loans is something every homeowner should be looking into right now.  There have been many changes to lender underwriting guidelines and we know property values are lower than they were several years ago.  Not everyone will be able to take advantage of these lower rates but it costs nothing to at least find out if refinancing is an option so don’t wait until rates start trending back up, make a call today and find out.

Don’t overreact to stock market’s ups and downs

By David Pitt

The Associated Press

updated 9:22 am PT, Mon., June 7, 2010

Highlights:
Understand the market

Part of learning to ignore the swings is understanding that some amount of market volatility is normal. The key is to understand that it can be caused by different factors.

Today’s market fluctuation is nothing like 2008 when credit markets were collapsing, banks had little liquidity and the economy was on the verge of a meltdown, said Rose Greene, a Los Angeles financial adviser.

“It may have nothing to do with North Korea, China or Europe,” she said. “If you know that, you can incorporate that into your thinking and you can breathe.”

To read the full article click HERE

Investing in mutual funds involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Investments in specialized industry sectors have additional risks, which are outlined in the prospectus.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. You can obtain a prospectus from your financial representative. Read carefully before investing.

Main Street’s anger over Wall Street reaches the Senate floor.
Provided by Financial Planner, Rose Greene, CFP®

Another reform bill is now making its way through the Senate – a bill that would reregulate the financial services industry with a few goals in mind:

1) Preventing failures of large banks and financial services firms, or at least insulating taxpayers and the economy in such an emergency
2) Creating a new financial watchdog agency to protect consumers
3) Tightening regulations on derivatives
4) Banning banks from proprietary trading (with the “Volcker Rule”)
5) Increasing transparency_1,2,3

Anger on Main Street, while palpable, won’t pass these reforms. In the Senate, Democrats are largely driving them; Republicans want to see them altered. Let’s look at them briefly.

The bailout issue. The bill introduced by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) would set up an “orderly liquidation fund” – $50 billion deep – to help the federal government wind down any big banks that threaten to go belly up.₃ Senate Republicans argue that this would amount to a permanent “bailout fund” that would implicitly encourage federal bank rescues. Some Republicans think it perpetuates the “too big to fail” mentality.

A group of Congressional Democrats have introduced the S.A.F.E. Banking Act, which would cap bank size: no U.S. bank or bank holding company could hold more than 10% of the country’s insured deposits. The S.A.F.E. Act would also hold the amount of non-deposit liabilities at financial institutions at 2% of GDP for banks, and set a 6% leverage limit for bank holding companies.₄

The bill introduced by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) would set up an "orderly iquidation fund" - $50 billion deep - to help the federal government wind down any big banks that threaten to go belly up.

The proposed new Bureau. The reform bill proposes creating a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, possibly as an offshoot of the Federal Reserve. It would watch over banks and credit unions with $10 billion or more in assets, as well as major investment firms and mortgage lenders apart from the banking industry. In addition to trying to protect people from predatory or discriminatory practices, the BCFP would also seek to better inform consumers via an Office of Financial Literacy.₂ Skeptics see this as another multibillion-dollar layer of bureaucracy, a “fifth wheel” whose mission could just as well be handled by an augmented Fed.

Crackdowns on derivatives & proprietary trading. Ah yes, derivatives – those investments no one really understood. Or watched closely. The reform bill would require banks to build a wall between their derivatives trading and their commercial banking operations – in other words, the “Volcker Rule” would be the law. Well, banks do make a lot of money through proprietary trading in their own accounts. In late April, JP Morgan analysts concluded that if the Volcker Rule went into effect, the six biggest global investment banks would need $85 billion more to capitalize the new investment banking divisions they would need to create. According to the JPMorgan scenario, Deutsche Bank would have to grab $26 billion alone and BNP Paribas would have to come up with $21.1 billion.₅

A better understanding for all? If the reforms become law, regulators would work to make the “fine print” that comes with a credit card, a mutual fund or a mortgage product clearer, so that fees and other quietly assessed charges would become easier to understand. Hedge funds would have to register with the federal government. Certain Democrat-driven amendments would even demand more transparency at the Federal Reserve. As Sen. Bernard Sanders [I-VT] remarked in late April, “During the bailout, the Fed lent trillions of dollars at zero or near-zero interest rates to large financial institutions. During the Budget Committee hearing, I asked Chairman Bernanke who received that money, [and] he refused to tell us.”

A new chapter, or a whole new book? You could argue – convincingly – that a loosely regulated Wall Street caused or least exacerbated the “Great Recession”. In the aftermath of that downturn, we may see the biggest rewrite of financial rules and regulations since the Great Depression coming before 2010 ends.

Rose Greene is a Representative with Rose Greene Financial and may be reached at www.rosegreene.com, (310)399-1200 or rose@rosegreene.com.

This material was prepared by Peter Montoya Inc, and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting Representative or the Representative’s Broker/Dealer. This information should not be construed as investment advice. Neither the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. Please consult your Financial Advisor for further information. petermontoya.com, montoyaregistry.com, marketinglibrary.net

Citations
1 – msnbc.msn.com/id/36770907/ns/business-us_business/ [4/27/10]
2 – csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0429/Financial-reform-bill-101-what-it-means-for-consumers [4/29/10]
3 – csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0428/Financial-reform-four-sticking-points [4/28/10]
4 – memphisdailynews.com/editorial/Article.aspx?id=49660 [4/29/10]
5- reuters.com/article/idUSN2924718120100429 [4/29/10]
6 – csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0428/Republicans-relent-clear-financial-reform-bill-for-debate/%28page%29/2 [4/28/10]

Here’s an overview of the retirement plan landscape, excerpted from a special section on our website, “IRA Rollovers for Dummies“.
provided by Los Angeles Financial Planner Rose Greene, CFP®

All retirement plans are not the same. In fact, there is such a wide variety of retirement plans that it is worth it to read up on your choices. Here’s a brief look at the different plans and what they have to offer.

The Traditional 401(k). Most people have such a retirement savings plan, and it works like this. The plan is funded with pre-tax dollars taken out of your paycheck (through payroll deductions). If you’re lucky, your company will match your level of contribution or even make contributions on your behalf – after all, the employer contributions are tax-deductible. The I.R.S. will currently let you put up to $16,500 a year in a Traditional 401(k); COLA adjustments may drive that limit higher in the future.

The I.R.S. also allows catch-up contributions (additional contributions from those aged 50+), with a current annual limit of $5,500. In 2010, the total amount put into a 401(k) by you and your employer can’t exceed $49,000.₁

There are several variations on the traditional 401(k) theme …

The Safe Harbor 401(k). A byproduct of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, the Safe Harbor plan combines the best features of the traditional 401(k) and a SIMPLE IRA, making it very attractive to a business owner. With a Safe Harbor plan, an owner-operator can avoid the big administrative expenses of a traditional 401(k) and enjoy higher contribution limits. The Safe Harbor plan allows for employers to make matching or non-elective contributions. Typically, employers match contributions dollar-for-dollar up to 3% of an employee’s income.₂

The SIMPLE 401(k). Designed for small business owners who don’t want to deal with retirement plan administration or non-discrimination tests, the SIMPLE 401(k) is available for businesses with less than 100 employees. Like a Safe Harbor plan, the business owner must make fully vested contributions (up to 3% of an employee’s income). But the maximum pretax employee contribution to a SIMPLE 401(k) is $11,500, and employees with a SIMPLE 401(k) can’t have another retirement plan with that company.₂

The Solo 401(k). Combine a profit-sharing plan with a regular 401(k), and you have the Solo 401(k) plan, a retirement savings vehicle designed for sole proprietors with no employees other than their spouses. These plans currently permit you to contribute up to $49,000 annually plus $5,500 in catch-up contributions for a total of $54,500 if you are 50 or older.₃

The Roth 401(k). Imagine a Traditional 401(k) fused with a Roth IRA. Here’s the big difference: you contribute after-tax income to a Roth 401(k), and when you reach age 59½, your withdrawals will be tax-free (provided you’ve had your plan for more than five years). The annual contribution limits are the same as those for a Traditional 401(k) plan.₄

You can roll Roth 401(k) assets into a Roth IRA when you retire – and you don’t have to make mandatory withdrawals from a Roth IRA when you turn 70½. With a standard 401(k), you have to roll over the assets to a traditional IRA and make the required withdrawals.₄

The DB(k). The DB(k) is a defined benefit retirement plan with some of the features of a 401(k). Companies with fewer than 500 employees are starting to put them into place. They offer plan participants a retirement savings plan with the potential for a small income stream in the future, mimicking the pensions of years past. The pension income equals either a) 1% of final average pay times the number of years of service, or b) 20% of that worker’s average salary during his or her five consecutive highest-earning years._5,6

And then there are SEP-IRA, SIMPLE IRA and Keogh plans …

The SEP-IRA. This employer-funded plan gives businesses a simplified vehicle to make contributions toward workers’ retirements (and optionally, their own). The employer contributions are 100% vested from the start, and the employer can supplement the SEP-IRA with another retirement plan. In 2010, these plans have a $49,000 maximum contribution limit, and an individual’s personal contribution limit depends on such factors as service, performance, and salary. These plans don’t permit catch-up contributions._3,7

The SIMPLE IRA. This is like a SIMPLE 401(k) – a small business retirement plan with mandatory employer and optional employee contributions and a current $11,500 annual contribution cap. But in this plan, there is one big difference for the business owner. If the business is not doing well, the owner can reduce plan contributions. The employer contributions are still 100% vested from the beginning, and $2,500 catch-up contributions are currently allowed for employees 50 and older._3,8

The Keogh Plan. The Keogh is designed for small unincorporated businesses. There are defined benefit, money purchase and profit-sharing variations; the defined benefit variation is a qualified pension plan offering a fixed benefit amount. In 2010, the annual contribution limit for a profit-sharing Keogh is $49,000.₉

Did you know you had so many choices? If you are an employer, you may not have realized you have such an array of choices in retirement plans. But you do, and asking the right questions may represent the first step toward implementing the right plan for your future or your company. Be sure to ask a qualified financial advisor or business retirement plan consultant about your options today.

For more information, visit a special section on our website called IRA  Rollovers for Dummies. Still confused? Call Rose at 310.3991200 and she’ll answer all your questions.

Rose Greene is a Representative with Rose Greene Financial and may be reached at www.rosegreene.com, (310)399-1200 or rose@rosegreene.com.

1 smartmoney.com/personal-finance/retirement/got-a-401k-question-13841/ [2/2/10]2 irs.gov/retirement/article/0,,id=119625,00.html [1/5/10]3 turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tools/tax-tips/tax-planning-and-checklists/5438.html [4/19/10]4 smartmoney.com/personal-finance/retirement/understanding-the-roth-401k-17679/ [2/2/10]5 kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/DBk_pension_of_future_090819.html [8/19/09]6 bankrate.com/finance/retirement/where-to-find-income-for-retirement-1.aspx [3/9/10]7 irs.gov/retirement/article/0,,id=111419,00.html [2/3/10]8 irs.gov/retirement/article/0,,id=111403,00.html [10/16/09]9 moneycentral.msn.com/quickref/quickref.asp?cat=10&qamode=2&reftype=0&selcat=6&sub=4&topic=5 [4/19/10]

Run the numbers, because the answer could be “yes.”
provided by Los Angeles Financial Planner Rose Greene Financial, CFP ®

An underreported story. In 2010, we have a wave of IRA owners converting traditional IRAs to Roths. There are all kinds of compelling reasons to make that move. Yet for some IRA owners, the conversion may have an unintended consequence: it may reduce their son or daughter’s chances for college financial aid.

If your kids are young, time is on your side. If your children are a few years or more away from college, you can make a Roth conversion without having to worry about its impact on FAFSA applications.

A Roth conversion will increase your taxable income. As some scholarships, grants and loans are awarded based on income levels, a big jump in AGI could potentially jeopardize them. This can be a problem if you’re a “millionaire next door” who wants your kids to exploit financial aid as much as possible.

That income must be recorded on the FAFSA. Universities commonly use the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) as a test to determine whether a student is eligible for grants, loans and some scholarships. The FAFSA is all about family income – factors like net worth and invested assets don’t come into play. Mom and Dad’s higher AGI could mean lower levels of financial aid, because the income boost from the Roth conversion will make it look like Mom and Dad can now shoulder a greater percentage of education costs._1,2

A New York Times article offered an example. Take a hypothetical family of four with total 2010 income of $75,000 and one college student. For every $10,000 of taxable income stemming from a Roth conversion, the parents’ expected annual contribution to that student’s education would go up by $3,200 in a FAFSA estimate.₁

In April, Mark Kantrowitz (publisher of FastWeb.com, an online scholarship directory) told Financial Advisor Magazine that the Department of Education had requested universities to recognize the effect of 2010 Roth conversions on family incomes. No evidence suggests colleges are doing this en masse.₂

Financial aid decisions are often based on multiple years of income. Keep this in mind. IRA owners who go Roth this year are well aware that they may divide taxes on the conversion across the 2011 and 2012 tax years. Well, that decision may affect family incomes for those years, and possibly chances at student loans, grants and scholarships through 2013.₁

If your kids are young, time is on your side. If your children are a few years or more away from college, you can make a Roth conversion without having to worry about its impact on FAFSA applications.

Any potential Roth IRA conversion should be analyzed for its impact on other aspects of your family’s financial life. The impact on college financial aid is but one factor to consider. The potential long-term benefits of a Roth IRA conversion are considerable. Confer with a financial consultant to see if the decision is appropriate before you elect to make the move.

Rose Greene is a Representative with Rose Greene Financial and may be reached at www.rosegreene.com, (310)399-1200 or rose@rosegreene.com.

This material was prepared by Peter Montoya Inc., not the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer, and should not be construed as investment advice. Neither the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. Please consult your Financial Advisor for further information. montoyaregistry.com petermontoya.com Citations. 1 bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/how-a-roth-i-r-a-conversion-can-hurt-financial-aid/ [4/16/10] 2 fa-mag.com/fa-news/5452-roth-ira-rollovers-could-affect-college-financial-aid.html [4/21/10]

Good question. Congress has elected to keep us in suspense.
provided by Los Angeles Financial Planner, Rose Greene, CFP®

0% estate taxes in 2010 … for now, anyway. On January 1, the federal estate tax went away – at least for the time being and perhaps for all of 2010 as envisioned back in 2001. President Obama and Congressional leaders wanted the estate tax to stick around in 2010 at 2009 levels (estate taxes up to 45% with a $3.5 million exemption), but lawmakers were preoccupied with other matters._1,2

Will Washington really give families million-dollar tax breaks? If no estate tax is imposed in 2010, it could mean a savings of millions for wealthy families. There is talk of bringing the tax back retroactively – after all, the federal government could really use the money. Yet the further we get from January 1, the more difficult reinstating the estate tax for 2010 may become.

As American Institute of Certified Public Accountants vice-president for taxation Tom Ochsenschlager told MarketWatch, “They’re still talking (in Congress) about making something retroactive, but at some point they can’t do that … is it even constitutional? There’s a real question about that.”

The unconstitutional argument goes like this: if Congress moves to retroactively apply the estate tax for 2010, an estate could take the matter to court and point out that Congress had all year to reinstate it but failed to do so.

That argument aside, some estate planners think Congress will get around to a retroactive measure – one that would put the 2009 estate tax levels back into place for 2010.

No Federal Estate Tax for 2010?

What taxes are in place now? Some taxes still apply to estates in 2010 even if the estate tax doesn’t. People who give away more than $1 million during their life still face federal gift taxes – though in 2010, they max out at 35% instead of 45%.₃

Also, all assets with capital gains are to be taxed at 15% above a $1.3 million federal exemption when sold by heirs in 2010. The big news here is that heirs don’t get to use a step-up this year. When they compute the value of an inherited asset, they have to use the basis (the original price paid for the asset) instead of how much that asset was worth when the original owner died. (In addition to the $1.3 million exemption per estate just mentioned, there is another $3 million exemption available for assets inherited from a spouse.)₃

What precautions may be wise this year? As a potential heir, you’ll want to document the cost basis of any assets you might receive in 2010. Good recordkeeping is in order.

Additionally, you may want to search a trust or a will for so-called formula clauses anchored by words such as “that portion”, “that amount” or “that fraction”, especially if the will or trust was created some years ago with the presumption of a constantly increasing federal estate tax exemption.

These formula clauses are fundamental to bypass trusts created to defend estate tax exemptions for a couple. However, these clauses assume that there is an estate tax. With no estate tax in place, there is the possibility (depending on how the formula clause is worded) that a deceased spouse’s assets would not be inherited by the surviving spouse, but instead go directly into the family trust – not the most useful result for the surviving spouse.₃

What will 2011 bring? Well – if there are no changes – the estate tax and the generation-skipping tax would come back in 2011. Only the first $1 million of an estate would be exempt from estate taxes. Assets above the exemption would be hit with a 55% federal penalty.3 However, the Obama administration had talked of keeping the 2009 estate tax levels in place for 2010 and beyond, which would be better than returning to the pre-EGGTRA levels in 2011.

Rose Greene is a Representative with Rose Greene Financial and may be reached at http://www.rosegreene.com, (310)399-1200 or rose@rosegreene.com.

This material was prepared by Peter Montoya Inc., not the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer, and should not be construed as investment advice. Neither the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. Before considering any estate planning strategies, consult your legal and tax advisers before making decisions regarding your specific situation
Please consult your Financial Advisor for further information.

Citations.
1 marketwatch.com/story/money-for-nothing-congress-awol-on-the-estate-tax-2010-02-15 [2/15/10]
2 online.wsj.com/article/SB123846422014872229.html [3/31/09]
3 investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100214/REG/302149985/1031/RETIREMENT [2/14/10]

provided by Los Angeles Financial Planner, Rose Greene, CFP®

In 2010, anyone may convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. No income limits will stand in the way of the conversion.₁ Should you do it? Here’s why it may (or may not) make sense for you to go Roth this year.

Why you might want to consider it. A Roth IRA permits tax-free growth and tax-free income distributions in retirement (assuming you are age 59½ or older and have held your Roth account for 5 years or longer). You can contribute to a Roth IRA after age 70½, without having to take mandatory withdrawals. While contributions to a Roth IRA aren’t tax-deductible, the younger you are, the more attractive a Roth IRA may seem.₂

However, older investors have reason to go Roth as well – especially if they don’t really need to withdraw IRA assets. Under present tax law, converting an untapped traditional IRA to a Roth will shrink the size of your taxable estate, and careful estate planning could foster decades of tax-free growth for those IRA assets.₃

Currently, if you name your spouse as the beneficiary of your Roth IRA, your spouse can treat the inherited IRA as his or her own after you die and forego withdrawals. So those Roth IRA assets can keep compounding untaxed across the rest of your spouse’s life.₄

If your spouse then names a son or daughter as a beneficiary, that heir has the choice to make minimum withdrawals according to his or her life expectancy, all while the assets continue to compound tax-free. Currently, withdrawals from an inherited Roth IRA are not subject to income tax.₃

The federal government may be giving you a tax break this year.

Why you may want to think twice about it. The IRS regards a traditional IRA-to-Roth IRA conversion as a distribution from a  traditional IRA - a taxable event.₅ You’ll need to pay taxes on the entire amount of the conversion.

If you talk to your local tax preparer, CPA or financial planner, you will probably find all of them agreeing on one thing: federal income tax rates are likely to be higher in the future than they are now. This is another reason why 2010 may be a good time to convert.

You could simply do a partial Roth IRA conversion if converting the full amount would send you into a higher tax bracket. If you think you have more IRA assets than you need, a partial Roth conversion could result in a more manageable short-term tax impact as you pursue the objectives of having some tax-free retirement income or leaving some IRA assets to your heirs.

You may be tempted to use the current IRA assets to pay the conversion tax, but should you? If you’re younger than 59½, you’re looking at a 10% penalty on the amount you withdraw, and you’ll lose the chance for tax-free compounding of those assets within the Roth IRA.₆

Be sure to consult your tax advisor before you convert. This is a very good idea before you arrange any rollover, trustee-to-trustee transfer, or same-trustee transfer of your IRA assets. There are many variables to consider, and they differ greatly from person to person. In any year, you should fully understand the potential tax impact of a Roth conversion on your finances and your estate.

Also, remember that while the income limit on Roth IRA conversions will go away in 2010, the income limits on Roth IRA contributions still apply next year and for the foreseeable future. So high-income IRA owners can make the conversion, but they may not be able to pour new money into the account. For 2010, the MAGI phase-out limits kick in at $105,000 for single filers and $167,000 for joint filers. However, those income limits don’t prevent you from contributing to a traditional IRA in 2010 and converting that IRA to a Roth.₇

Rose Greene is a Representative with Rose Greene Financial and may be reached at http://www.rosegreene.com, (310)399-1200 or rose@rosegreene.com.

This material was prepared by Peter Montoya Inc., not the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer, and should not be construed as investment advice. Neither the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. Please consult your Financial Advisor for further information.

Citations.
1 kiplinger.com/magazine/archives/2009/01/sweet-deal-on-roth-ira-conversion.html [1/09]
2 thestreet.com/print/story/10505164.html [5/26/09]
3 smartmoney.com/personal-finance/retirement/estate-planning-with-a-roth-ira-7966/ [1/22/09]
4 smartmoney.com/personal-finance/retirement/roth-iras-to-convert-or-not-7965/ [1/10/08]
5 smartmoney.com/personal-finance/retirement/roth-iras-you-wanted-to-know-7967/ [1/9/08]
6 cnbc.com/id/34511917 [12/21/09]
7 northjersey.com/news/business/82334757_Make_a_New_Year_s_to-do_list_to__bring_home_the_bacon__.html [1/22/10]